3

STARC (STAndardised Reward Comparison) metrics, a class of pseudometrics, quantify differences between reward functions, providing theoretical and empirical tools to improve the analysis and safety of reward learning algorithms in reinforcement learning.

Do language models implicitly learn a concept of human wellbeing? We explore this through the ETHICS Utilitarianism task, assessing if scaling enhances pretrained models’ representations.

Language model attacks typically assume one of two extreme threat models: full white-box access to model weights, or black-box access …

We found a way to modify neural networks to make their internals more interpretable and steerable while causing only a small degradation of performance. At each layer, we apply a quantization bottleneck that forces the activation vector into a sum of a few discrete codes; converting an inscrutable, dense, and continuous vector into a discrete list of codes from a learned codebook that are either on or off.

This paper introduces a statistical method for eliciting beliefs encoded in LLMs using surveys. We apply this method to study the encoded moral beliefs in 28 open- and closed-source LLMs. Our results demonstrate that most LLMs exhibit low uncertainty in unambiguous moral scenarios and that their preferences align with common sense judgements. In ambiguous moral scenarios, we find that only a few LLMs exhibit clear preferences and that closed-source models tend to agree with each other.

This paper systematizes the mechanistic interpretability process into 3 iterative steps, then proceeds to automate one of them: circuit discovery. Two of the algorithms presented automatically discover interpretability results previously established by human inspection.

This paper presents instances of inverse scaling: tasks where language models get worse with scale rather than better. These 11 examples were selected from 99 submissions in an open competition, the Inverse Scaling Prize. The paper also discusses inverse scaling in the literature and identifies four potential causes of inverse scaling. The prize-winning tasks have helped drive the discovery of U-shaped and inverted-U scaling trends, where an initial trend reverses, suggesting that scaling trends are less reliable at predicting the behavior of larger-scale models than previously understood.

The paper presents a new algorithm called Imitation learning from Language Feedback (ILF) that enables pre-trained large language models to learn from natural language feedback at training time, which is both user-friendly and sample-efficient. The algorithm can be seen as minimizing the KL divergence to the ground truth distribution. The paper shows that ILF outperforms both fine-tuning on the Mostly Basic Python Problems benchmark and fine-tuning on repaired programs written by humans, improving the pass@1 rate of the Codegen-Mono 6.1B model by 38% relative and 10% absolute.

The paper presents a novel method called Imitation learning from Language Feedback (ILF) to tackle the problem of pretrained language models producing outputs misaligned with human preferences. ILF leverages more informative language feedback through a three-step iterative process: (1) conditioning the language model on input, initial output, and feedback, (2) generating refinements and selecting the one that incorporates the most feedback, and (3) finetuning the language model based on the chosen refinement. Experimental results indicate that ILF effectively scales with dataset size and achieves human-level summarization performance by learning from both language and comparison feedback.

The tuned lens learns an affine transformation to decode the activations of each layer of a transformer as next-token predictions. This provides insights into how model predictions are refined layer by layer. We validate our method on various autoregressive language models up to 20B parameters, showing it to be more predictive, reliable and unbiased than the logit lens baseline.